Kenwood Press

Serving the communities of Kenwood, Glen Ellen and Oakmont

email print
Guest Editor: 02/01/2018

Supervisors should reinstate vacation rental moratorium

By Ed Davis, Glen Ellen

At the Jan. 23 meeting of our Board of Supervisors, the board unfortunately voted to end the moratorium they so wisely instituted on new VRBOs (short-term vacation rentals) right after the fires. In doing so, they removed the one certain protection we had against VRBO speculators eager to profit from our recent disaster, while also unintentionally creating a huge incentive for those very speculators to move as quickly as possible, or risk losing their chance.

Here’s what happened. The board understands that their current VRBO regulations need work, particularly in light of the recent fires that cost us over 5,000 homes for families who actually want to live here. The board expressed some promising ideas about how to do this, and seems open to others. That’s good. But by both ending the moratorium, and signaling that rule changes are coming, they sent a clear message to VRBO speculators; act NOW! Buy up burned-out properties or existing homes (many probably already have), and get them licensed as VRBOs immediately, before things change.

Whether or not you like short-term rentals as a concept, whether or not you would welcome them in your neighborhood – or would like to have one next door – we can certainly all agree that every home converted to a VRBO is one less home for families. Having just lost over 5,000 homes, don’t we owe it to ourselves as a community to hit the “Pause Button” on creating new ones until the smoke actually clears?

Do we need more family homes right now? Yes, desperately.

Do we really need more VRBOs… right now?

There is an opportunity here for the board to do a very good thing. Bring back the moratorium as an action item at the Feb. 6 meeting, and extend it long enough to give county staff ample time to evaluate and implement suggestions BEFORE reopening the VRBO application process.

VRBOs can make a lot of money, which is why outside investors are flocking to them. They were already spreading like wildfire before the real fire hit, and many neighborhoods had already started to strongly resist. Prior to Oct. 9, the actions of cities like Sonoma and Healdsburg, and the county’s limited exclusion zones, had provided some protection, but that only put more VRBO pressure on those areas where they are still allowed.

Then everything caught fire. Now a burned-out homeowner in one of those vulnerable zones faces a hard choice. Do they rebuild as a home, and endure all that comes with that process? Or do they take the insurance money, and sell to a VRBO speculator who has no connection to the neighborhood at all?

Reinstating the moratorium puts that whole process on hold, giving the county a chance to protect those remaining target areas that are now so subject to exploitation.

The ideas expressed by board members on Tuesday to provide that protection were very good.

• Make the burn areas exclusion zones for five years.

• Carefully reevaluate how the initial exclusion zones were drawn, to see how they might be logically modified.

• Look to “Hosted” VRBOs as a possible way forward, so a responsible party will be on site if the “party” gets out of hand.

• Look at the current $10,000 dollar cost for a neighborhood to request becoming an exclusion zone. Neighbors should not be paying for the right to keep their neighborhood a neighborhood, nor should the county. That cost should go to the VRBO speculator.

Reinstituting the moratorium, before a flood of new VRBO applications pour in, will go a very long way toward reassuring those whose neighborhoods have already been gutted by VRBOs, and those who fear that their neighborhoods are about to be gutted, that the board has their backs.

This board’s intentions are good, but they took an unfortunate misstep in ending the moratorium. Please join me in encouraging James Gore (, the Board Chairman, to agendize this item for their Feb. 6 meeting, so that this essential protection for our neighborhoods and burned-out areas can be put back into place until such time as the board can update their existing VRBO regulations to reflect the new reality in Sonoma County.

Ed Davis is a longtime Glen Ellen resident who, after the fires, created a Facebook page that enabled fire victims to connect with property owners who had available housing. These efforts enabled over 50 families who lost their homes to find housing.

Readers may submit articles of approximately 800 words to the Guest Editor column. Email Although we intend to print all submissions, we do reserve the right to refuse to publish any article.

Recently Published:

11/01/2018 - No on Measure T – No blank check
11/01/2018 - Where is Oakmont headed?
11/01/2018 - Yes on Measure T
10/15/2018 - For SDC, let’s try something different
10/15/2018 - Remembering Guardians in the Land of Fire
09/01/2018 - Sonoma Development Center update
09/01/2018 - The promise of SDC: A community call to action
09/01/2018 - Yellowstone wolves: What happened when they came back, and what could happen here
08/15/2018 - Don’t gamble with Oakmont’s future
08/15/2018 - Apothevert should be granted a use permit
08/01/2018 - Keep commercial marijuana away from our parks
08/01/2018 - Oakmont residents should not pay to save Oakmont Golf Club
07/01/2018 - What does homelessness feel like?
07/01/2018 - Strangers in paradise
06/01/2018 - Transforming SDC: Don't tread on us

Community Calendar

Thanksgiving Break Day Camp
Al Anon meeting
Yoga Hike, 3-5:30 p.m.
Family Green Friday Hike, 10 a.m.-noon
Turkey Waddle at Jack London
Redwood Empire Food Bank’s Station 3990 food giveaway
Oakmont Farmers Market
Kenwood Community Church service
Oakmont Community Church service
Zen meditation at the Kenwood Depot
Emmaus Inclusive Community service and potluck supper

Weather Underground PWS KCAKENWO2